[ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization

[Barry Leiba]

> This paragraph is rather misleading because it implies to me that you must
> convert to the canonical form for the *hash* function, not that you must 
> convert the message before forwarding.

OK; if you can propose a rewrite to Eric that'll make the intended 
meaning clearer, I'm sure he'll appreciate that.

> I'd still like to hear from Eric about this though.

Yep; me too.  He's away (and away from computers), and will be back some 
time next week.

Barry

--
Barry Leiba, Internet Messaging Technology  (leiba at watson.ibm.com)
http://www.research.ibm.com/people/l/leiba
http://www.research.ibm.com/spam