[ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822
lear at cisco.com
Thu Jul 20 09:45:18 PDT 2006
Dave Crocker wrote:
> I think your language describes things quite nicely.
> I am pretty sure that DKIM does not have anything that cares about 822 vs. 2822.
> That is, it works for both.
> So I have tended to view the dual-reference approach as a means of communicating
> to folks that they do not have to worry about old-vs-new specifications for
> message syntax/semantics.
I agree but perhaps we need to be a bit more explicit about exactly what
you say above, Dave.
More information about the ietf-dkim