[ietf-dkim] 822/2822 or just 2822

[Eliot Lear]

Dave Crocker wrote:
>
> I think your language describes things quite nicely.
>
> I am pretty sure that DKIM does not have anything that cares about 822 vs. 2822.
>  That is, it works for both.
>
> So I have tended to view the dual-reference approach as a means of communicating
> to folks that they do not have to worry about old-vs-new specifications for
> message syntax/semantics.
>
>   

I agree but perhaps we need to be a bit more explicit about exactly what
you say above, Dave.

Eliot