[ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization
MarkD+dkim at yahoo-inc.com
Fri Jul 14 17:40:53 PDT 2006
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 04:55:23PM -0700, Michael Thomas allegedly wrote:
> In a word, it's very, very real, and I believe that simple
> canonicalization will need
> to be changed to accommodate this. I just read through RFC 2822 and it
> has this
To work around broken mailers? I think not.
A good number of sites reject bare LFs. Also at least the standard
qmail inbound smtp rejects such email. I hope that other well
implemented receivers do the same.
Hopefully the trend to accept any goop is declining rather than
increasing. I expect my inbound SMTP receiver to only present me with
a valid SMTP stream.
More information about the ietf-dkim