[ietf-dkim] More on naked CR canonicalization

[Mark Delany]

On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 04:55:23PM -0700, Michael Thomas allegedly wrote:
> 
> In a word, it's very, very real, and I believe that simple 
> canonicalization will need
> to be changed to accommodate this. I just read through RFC 2822 and it 
> has this

To work around broken mailers? I think not.

A good number of sites reject bare LFs. Also at least the standard
qmail inbound smtp rejects such email. I hope that other well
implemented receivers do the same.

Hopefully the trend to accept any goop is declining rather than
increasing. I expect my inbound SMTP receiver to only present me with
a valid SMTP stream.

Mark.