[ietf-dkim] +1 on requirements for ssp-like-thing
ietf-dkim at kitterman.com
Fri Jul 14 13:11:00 PDT 2006
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:46:34 -0600 Arvel Hathcock <arvel.hathcock at altn.com>
> > 1) I sign everything, for some value of everything
> > 2) I don't send email at all.
>I'm sorry I had to miss the meetings in Montreal.
>I want to put forth my belief that, whatever form SSP ultimately takes,
>being able to say "everything that uses my domain name in the From
>header can be expected to contain my digital signature" seems the rock
>bottom minimum requirement (at least for me). Anything more might be
>nice, and I probably want some of it too, but we at least need this much.
More information about the ietf-dkim