[ietf-dkim] drop requirement to sign "From" or other"originator" headers?

[Damon]

+1

Damon Sauer


On 7/14/06, Hector Santos <hsantos at santronics.com> wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eric Allman" <eric+dkim at sendmail.org>
> To: "Mark Delany" <MarkD+dkim at yahoo-inc.com>
>
> > So, keeping From: in is just a matter of yielding to pragmatics,
> > specifically in avoiding an edge condition that I think we should
> > think through a bit more.  I'm happy to change it in -05 if we decide
> > we can manage the situation.
> >
> > eric
>
> +1.
>
> The key is if we manage situations that are created by relaxed provisions
> of
> the protocol, only then should you allow relaxed designs.
>
> IMV, we only need to point to SMTP with all its uncontrollable relaxed
> provisions that help get us here in the first place.
>
> --
> Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
> http://www.santronics.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/attachments/20060714/94bee88b/attachment.html