[ietf-dkim] DKIM Agenda Item Safer than SSP

[Dave Crocker]

Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> This seems to be a comment against SSP.
> 
> Wrong. it is a comment against trying to predict the future and gating
> our publication on those guesses. We can (should!) remain silent on
> future changes to email, and then deal with them when they happen. This
> is how IETF protocol development works.

Correct on all 3 counts.

and i suggest that we can now end this thread.

d/

-- 

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net