[ietf-dkim] DKIM Agenda Item Safer than SSP
dcrocker at bbiw.net
Thu Jul 6 04:30:43 PDT 2006
Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> This seems to be a comment against SSP.
> Wrong. it is a comment against trying to predict the future and gating
> our publication on those guesses. We can (should!) remain silent on
> future changes to email, and then deal with them when they happen. This
> is how IETF protocol development works.
Correct on all 3 counts.
and i suggest that we can now end this thread.
More information about the ietf-dkim