[ietf-dkim] section 5 rewrite?

[Paul Hoffman]

At 11:32 PM +0100 7/1/06, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>Section 5 generally, 1st one is 5.1, 2nd para. This section seems to be
>all, or almost all, advisory, in which case, it shouldn't use MAY,
>SHOULD etc. Another example is in 5.3 where it says something that an
>MUA "SHOULD" do. Suggest lower-casing all the MAY etc. Parts of 5.4
>where it says that "From:" MUST be signed etc. is an exception and but
>would be stated earlier, maybe in around the "h=" description.
>
>So, is a bit of re-writing of section 5 needed?

Agree.