[ietf-dkim] is s= really needed?

Paul Hoffman phoffman at proper.com
Sat Jul 1 18:48:37 PDT 2006


At 11:30 PM +0100 7/1/06, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>3.6.1, "s=". Given that new tags can be added to key records
>without affecting compliant implementations, I don't see why this
>is needed now and suggest deleting it.

Agree, but could also be happy leaving it in for some odd extension.


More information about the ietf-dkim mailing list