[ietf-dkim] Relaxed body canonicalization

[Jon Callas]

On 27 Jun 2006, at 5:24 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:

>
>
>> 1. Some people wouldn't see an important distinction between PS  
>> and DS
>> since more-or-less everyone has to implement the PS and few features,
>> once deployed, are totally deprecated. That might influence  
>> whether or
>> not you think its useful to remove it now or at DS. OTOH, if everyone
>> has to support simple regardless of PS vs. DS, then who cares?  
>> There's
>> no effect on interop.
>
>
> In addition, DS has become meaningless.
>
> Very few of standard-track documents ever go beyond PS.
>

Okay, so let me correct the specific data point of DS. We could delay  
to WG last call. A year ago, I would have thought that we'd never be  
able to drop a canonicalization like relaxed. It looks like that was  
pessimistic. I just don't think the time is now to drop it. If we  
agreed now to revisit during last call whether it was to stay or go,  
I'd be happy.

	Jon