[ietf-dkim] Summary of jabber meeting of 22 June
Eric Allman
eric at neophilic.com
Sat Jun 24 10:08:58 PDT 2006
--On June 24, 2006 11:01:58 AM +0000 John Levine <johnl at iecc.com>
wrote:
>> 1296: user at sub.example.com vs. user at example.com
>> This is John Levine's version of what basically is the same as
>> 1292. Let's see if John likes the answer to 1292 for this too.
>> 1296: CLOSE, see resolution for 1292 -- subject to confirmation
>> with JohnL.
>
> I don't see the point of a flag that will always be set the same
> way, but I can live with it.
John, I think one of us must be missing something. Why would the
flag always be set the same? The problem only occurs when you are
using g= in the key, and there might be good reason why you would not
want to limit the signature to the d= domain in this case, e.g.,
role-based names such as perhaps "postmaster".
eric
More information about the ietf-dkim
mailing list