[ietf-dkim] Montreal agenda, other than base
pbaker at verisign.com
Fri Jun 16 16:41:48 PDT 2006
> Defining a DKIM specific RR type should not prevent deployment.
> Defining the DKIM specific RR within the base draft means a
> new DKIM version is not required to enable its use. If there
> are issues
> handling a DKIM specific RR, this is a problem independent of DKIM.
> A new RR issue, if there are any, may delay exclusive
> reliance upon the DKIM specific RR.
I expect the deployment of DNSSEC to solve the RR problem.
I believe DKIM creates the market for DNSSEC.
If you can't see the problem I know a bunch of philosophers you might want to take out to dinner.
More information about the ietf-dkim