[ietf-dkim] Section 6 rewording

[Michael Thomas]

Jim Fenton wrote:

>First, sorry I missed the Jabber meeting this morning.  I read the
>transcript, and it looks like it was a good meeting.
>
>I noticed in the 4th paragraph of section 6, the word "otherwise" seems
>to have crept in between -02 and -03a.  The implication seems to be
>that, as soon as good signature is found, the verifier is all done. 
>There are good reasons why the verifier might want to verify multiple
>signatures, if present.  For example, it might not know which signing
>identities are significant to the recipient for acting on the message.
>
>>From the jabber chat, it appears this wasn't what was intended in any case.
>  
>
Jim --

The intent is to move the outer loop to its own indent level to
make that explicit.

       Mike