[ietf-dkim] weekly jabbering?
stephen.farrell at cs.tcd.ie
Mon May 22 23:49:04 PDT 2006
Douglas Otis wrote:
> On May 22, 2006, at 3:28 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>> So 4:0 for trying this for a few weeks. Barring a change in
>> that I guess we should go for it, starting this Thursday
>> at 1500 UTC (1600 Dublin, 1100 New York etc.) for 90 minutes.
>> Agenda is a continuation of issue processing. Will try to
>> update list beforehand.
> It could be helpful for details related to the algorithm's
> representation in the binary key be posted for review. Resolving the
> method of representation should allay some possible concerns.
> The review of a strategy for using a key deprecation flag should also be
> possible. Once there is an assured method to confirm an unknown
> algorithm is currently offered by a signing domain, detecting removal of
> a non-deprecated signature during a transition is possible. A signed
> message must contain at least one non-deprecated signature where the
> algorithm, even though unsupported by the verifier, must still be
> confirmed as supported by the signing domain in the referenced key.
> Without such a strategy, an opportunity to exploit a deprecated
> algorithm continues over the entire duration for a complete transition
> to occur, even in cases where both the signing and the verifying domains
> supported a newer non-exploited algorithm.
If you have a new technical issue, then create a new thread as discussed
previously. If its already in Eliot's list, then reference the number.
Technical comment in a thread about jabbering will be missed later.
More information about the ietf-dkim