[ietf-dkim] Today's jabber

[John Levine]

>NEW:	If there are
>NEW:	multiple query mechanisms listed, the choice of query mechanism
>NEW:	MUST NOT change the interpretation of the signature. An
>NEW:	implementation MUST use the recognized query mechanisms in the
>NEW:	order presented.

I can live with either of these sentences, but they don't make sense
togther.  If all of the mechanisms will give you the same answer, why
shouldn't I be allowed to send out all the queries at once and take
the one the comes back first?  Or if new ones are supersets of old
ones, prefer the more informative one?

R's,
John