[ietf-dkim] When i= domain != d= domain

[Bill.Oxley at cox.com]

In all cases we should be defining status of an event rather than conclusions about potential remedies


-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org on behalf of Eric Allman
Sent: Fri 4/28/2006 4:10 PM
To: arvel.hathcock at altn.com
Cc: ietf-dkim at mipassoc.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] When i= domain != d= domain
 
>  > It seems defining the state of the signature rather than possible
>  > remedies would be more useful.

phoffman> Fully agree.

arvel> This makes sense to me as well.

So is there consensus that this change belongs in -02?

eric

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html