[ietf-dkim] dkim-base: _domainkey vs _dkim

Douglas Otis dotis at mail-abuse.org
Wed Apr 26 08:33:37 PDT 2006


On Apr 26, 2006, at 6:24 AM, Michael Thomas wrote:

> Hector Santos wrote:
>
>> The document refers to both _domainkey vs. _dkim subdomains to DNS  
>> DKIM
>> records:
>>
>> | 3.6.2.1  Name Space
>> |
>> |    All DKIM keys are stored in a subdomain named  
>> ""_domainkey"".  Given
>> |    a DKIM-Signature field with a "d=" tag of ""example.com"" and  
>> an "s="
>> |    tag of ""sample"", the DNS query will be for
>> |    ""sample._domainkey.example.com"".
>>
>> and
>>
>> | A.3  The email signature is verified
>> |
>> |    The signature is normally verified by an inbound SMTP server or
>> |    possibly the final delivery agent.  However, intervening MTAs  
>> can
>> |    also perform this verification if they choose to do so.  The
>> |    verification process uses the domain "example.com" extracted  
>> from the
>> |    "d=" tag and the selector "brisbane" from the "s=" tag in the  
>> "DKIM-
>> |    Signature" header field to form the DNS DKIM query for:
>> |
>> |    brisbane._dkim.example.com
>>
>> How is this going to be handled?  Most testing domains are using  
>> _domainkey
>> or is _dkim targeted for a binary RR?
>>
>
> This is just a typo. A.3 should be _domainkey as well.

I know many don't like being so 1970ish, but to conserve DNS payload  
space, here is one example.  Introducing this change when going to  
the binary key seems like a good choice.

-Doug




More information about the ietf-dkim mailing list