[ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x=

[Mark Delany]

On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 09:37:09PM -0700, Jim Fenton allegedly wrote:
> > x=     Signature Expiration/Best-Before (plain-text, OPTIONAL, default is
> >        no expiration/best-before). The format is the same as the "t=" tag,
> >   
> 
> I'm not sure I want to start another discussion about the "t=" tag like
> we had about the "x=" tag, but I'm even less sure what to do with t=. 
> Do we want to base the format on that of t=?

Good point. I presume we might get to the semantics of t= at some
point. The safest definition for x= might be self-contained.


Mark.