[ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x=

[Hector Santos]

And this is from a person who has a nasty habit of censoring and banning
people from his so called anti-spam research areas.  If you were ignoring
me, and you know you don't, you wouldn't have read the message.

Ignore me if you want. I won't ignore you.  The fact is, certified mail
concepts raises the legal bar.  You come to realized this yourself, finally.
It is worth repeating:

http://www.circleid.com/posts/california_frets_about_goodmail_email/

    ....
    In the questions that followed we learned several
    interesting things. One is that AOL and Goodmail both agree
    that they are responsible for the mail they stamp, to the extent
    that if a phish or virus sneaks through with a stamp, they're
    on the hook for damages. This is something new in the world
    of e-mail.
    ....


---
HLS

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Levine" <johnl at iecc.com>
To: <ietf-dkim at mipassoc.org>
Cc: <phoffman at proper.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Attempted text for x=


> In article <p06230994c06c40383545@[10.20.30.249]> you write:
> >At 2:37 PM -0400 4/19/06, Hector Santos wrote:
>
> Try ignoring Hector.  Just about everyone else does.
>
> R's,
> John
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
>