[ietf-dkim] Alternative text for semantics of multiple signatures

[Paul Hoffman]

At 10:59 PM +0100 4/4/06, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>If no-one wants to insist on signatures having to be sequential,
>then this could be fairly easy!

Signatures have to be sequential if you sign them, given our current 
rules for signing and verifying h=. The question is whether or not we 
care about the cases where multiple signed headers get reordered, 
thus breaking the signature.