[ietf-dkim] Revised proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures

[Paul Hoffman]

At 9:16 AM -0700 4/4/06, Michael Thomas wrote:
>I have no idea why this merits even a SHOULD let alone a REQUIRED.

For interoperability. The current document says that it does not say 
what multiple signatures mean, nor does it give a standard way for a 
signer to attach multiple signatures to a message.