[ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures

[Arvel Hathcock]

 > 1. Whether we want to have a mechanism to let the signature survive
 > the reordering of multiple sig headers or not.  I've heard Mike and
 > Dave say no, we don't.  Is that correct?

I've also said it's added complexity that I don't think we need.

 > 2. Whether we want to be able to detect the removal of a signature
 > header (as perhaps in the case of a "stronger" one and leaving a
 > "weaker" one).  I think the consensus is that we don't care about
 > this; I'd like to confirm that.

Right, we don't care about that.

-- 
Arvel