[ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures

[Michael Thomas]

Barry Leiba wrote:
>> So, in an attempt to move towards that,  let me
>> try to ask for opinions on this discrete part of
>> the issue
> 
> 
> And I'd like to get us to close on two other discrete parts:
> 1. Whether we want to have a mechanism to let the signature survive the 
> reordering of multiple sig headers or not.  I've heard Mike and Dave say 
> no, we don't.  Is that correct?

The current mechanism of dkim-sig survives reordering just fine.
My opinion is to not break what isn't broken.

> 2. Whether we want to be able to detect the removal of a signature 
> header (as perhaps in the case of a "stronger" one and leaving a 
> "weaker" one).  I think the consensus is that we don't care about this; 
> I'd like to confirm that.

I don't care about this.

		Mike