[ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures

[Dave Crocker]

Barry Leiba wrote:
> And I'd like to get us to close on two other discrete parts:
> 1. Whether we want to have a mechanism to let the signature survive the 
> reordering of multiple sig headers or not.  
...
> 2. Whether we want to be able to detect the removal of a signature 
> header (as perhaps in the case of a "stronger" one and leaving a 


My question for each is why?

To do either of these requires additional mechanism.

So the question is what benefit will accrue... and why that benefit is essential 
to a task of the type DKIM is intended to perform?

d/

-- 

Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
<http://bbiw.net>