[ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures

[Barry Leiba]

> So, in an attempt to move towards that,  let me
> try to ask for opinions on this discrete part of
> the issue

And I'd like to get us to close on two other discrete parts:
1. Whether we want to have a mechanism to let the signature survive the 
reordering of multiple sig headers or not.  I've heard Mike and Dave say 
no, we don't.  Is that correct?

2. Whether we want to be able to detect the removal of a signature 
header (as perhaps in the case of a "stronger" one and leaving a 
"weaker" one).  I think the consensus is that we don't care about this; 
I'd like to confirm that.

Barry

--
Barry Leiba, Pervasive Computing Technology  (leiba at watson.ibm.com)
http://www.research.ibm.com/people/l/leiba
http://www.research.ibm.com/spam