[ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for multiple signatures

[Paul Hoffman]

At 4:54 PM -0800 3/30/06, Jim Fenton wrote:
>I'm concerned that including verification results is going to introduce
>a whole bunch of new semantics (and possibly transitive trust) to the
>multiple-signature case.

I am hearing a whole bunch of push-back and no support for the 
verification passthrough. Unless support appears in the next few 
days, I'll revise the proposal to remove it. I'll also change the 
"simple canonicalization" as well.