[ietf-dkim] Proposal for specifying syntax and semantics for
multiple signatures
Michael Thomas
mike at mtcc.com
Fri Mar 31 15:32:59 PST 2006
Mark Delany wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 02:25:49PM -0800, ned+dkim at mauve.mrochek.com allegedly wrote:
>
>
>
>>And let's please not forget that even if this got fixed tomorrow the amount of
>>time it takes to significantly deploy new MTA versions is very long - far
>>longer than we can afford to wait.
>>
>>
>
>I'm confused. We expect wide-spread use of this protocol without
>deploying new MTAs? That's quite the feat.
>
>
With milter, you don't have to upgrade your sendmail version. For us,
we'd probably have to go through a lot more contortions to get our
infosec folks to buy into a new sendmail version for our production
environment. Not undoable, but definitely harder.
My understanding is that other MTA's have similar plugin kinds of
capabilities too.
Mike
More information about the ietf-dkim
mailing list