SSP RR vs TXT [was Re: [ietf-dkim] SSP and o= values]

[william(at)elan.net]

On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Tony Hansen wrote:

> So it sounds like their database *will* support the additional RR
> values, it's just that they don't make it easy to use them.
>
> Until they get their standard interface fixed, it sounds like Microsoft
> (or a 3rd party) could provide an alternative interface that
> additionally stored the RRs in a separate database that would survive
> the reboot, and included a service that ran at boot time that would
> reload those additional RRs into the real database.
>
> Please correct me if I'm misunderstanding something here.

Yes, this is fairly close to how I remember it from discussions on MARID.
MS folks there were a lot more concerned about their proxy server
(I called it firewall in previous message which is not quite so).

-- 
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william at elan.net