[ietf-dkim] Recommend not adding DNS RR(s) into DKIM base doc
fenton at cisco.com
Mon Mar 27 17:19:05 PST 2006
Mark Delany wrote:
> In summary, regardless of the merits or otherwise, of splitting the
> base document, I would prefer that the base not-subsume the DKK RR and
> presumably the Policy/Practice/Preference/Percolator RR or whatever it
> will be called.
Agreed. Letting the design process of the DKK and DKP RRs go forward in
parallel is a substantial benefit.
More information about the ietf-dkim