[ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful
Barry Leiba
leiba at watson.ibm.com
Sat Mar 25 11:57:29 PST 2006
> How does this address my concern? This looks like my current receiver
> would fail with the new signature format. That's not backward compatable.
All verifiers already have to change, to support SHA-256.
Barry
--
Barry Leiba, Pervasive Computing Technology (leiba at watson.ibm.com)
http://www.research.ibm.com/people/l/leiba
http://www.research.ibm.com/spam
More information about the ietf-dkim
mailing list