[ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful

Barry Leiba leiba at watson.ibm.com
Sat Mar 25 11:57:29 PST 2006


> How does this address my concern? This looks like my current receiver
> would fail with the new signature format. That's not backward compatable.

All verifiers already have to change, to support SHA-256.

Barry

--
Barry Leiba, Pervasive Computing Technology  (leiba at watson.ibm.com)
http://www.research.ibm.com/people/l/leiba
http://www.research.ibm.com/spam


More information about the ietf-dkim mailing list