[ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful

[Mark Delany]

On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, william(at)elan.net allegedly wrote:

> Its nice to see you finally come around and adapting further META 
> signing structure
...

> of course you will probably never admit where this is all coming
> from ...

Of course we will. The idea is merely a variant of Content-MD5.

What Meta-whatever-it-is has to do with that admission I do not
know. Are you suggesting that Content-MD5 derived from Meta-whatever?


Mark.