[ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful

[Hallam-Baker, Phillip]

> [mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces at mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Michael Thomas

> Please. I brought this issue up. It was not the *only* 
> objection, and I *did* bring up an alternate way to solve the 
> problem without breaking backward compatibility, at least 
> until the motivation morphed into something other than the 
> originally stated goal.

Reading your original post I find only one argument against the proposal,
that it is a change.

I note that you also provide an alternative solution that does not involve a
change. It provides some but not all of the advantages of the 1193 proposal
but not all.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5986 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/attachments/20060322/ad11a82a/smime.bin