[ietf-dkim] 1193 considered harmful

Paul Hoffman phoffman at proper.com
Wed Mar 22 07:34:35 PST 2006


At 11:29 PM +0000 3/21/06, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>This is not a gratuitous change since there are folks who
>believe it offers sufficient advantage.

Exactly. People have listed multiple good results from the proposal. 
So far, the only negative result is that people who have written 
software to the -00 draft will have to change it.


More information about the ietf-dkim mailing list