[ietf-dkim] New Issue: z= field and EAI wg
dhc at dcrocker.net
Thu Mar 16 09:28:45 PST 2006
Stephen Farrell wrote:
> Even if it doesn't hit anywhere else, presumably the EAI work will
> have to be taken into account for the z= field, with potential
> changes being required to the current ABNF?
How does one 'take into account' work that has not even been chartered to start
the standards process?
More information about the ietf-dkim