[ietf-dkim] Re: Concerns about DKIM and mailiing lists, etc.
mike at mtcc.com
Thu Mar 16 08:03:48 PST 2006
John L wrote:
>>> Oh, OK, then your trusted signer list includes cisco.com.
>> Not really, unless you consider SSP to be a "trusted signer list".
> Oh, wow, are you really planning to reject all mail that fails SSP? I
> guess we should have a pool on how long that will last until some VP
> blows up because it rejected some piece of real mail she really, really
> wanted. I'll bid on two hours.
John, would you please try to read my notes instead of just
playing a parlor game with them. I said that we plan to annotate
the mail if it doesn't verify. We're not idiots, and it's a
disservice to the entire community that you are treating us as
if we were.
>>> Mail from this list won't validate, you know, and I doubt that many
>>> others will, but I know I'm not going to make any headway in that
>> Every piece of mail I've sent this morning has validated. Really.
> That's because it was all Re: and already had the subject line tag.
> It's your lucky day.
Please try to stay within your own experience. You clearly have
no idea what you're talking about here. I've implemented this and have
*way* more experience at where the problem are and are not. You're
quite simply wrong, and it's not helping this working group when you're
spreading clearly false information.
More information about the ietf-dkim