[ietf-dkim] Re: Concerns about DKIM and mailiing lists, etc.

[Michael Thomas]

John L wrote:
>>> Oh, OK, then your trusted signer list includes cisco.com. 
>>
>>
>> Not really, unless you consider SSP to be a "trusted signer list".
> 
> 
> Oh, wow, are you really planning to reject all mail that fails SSP?  I 
> guess we should have a pool on how long that will last until some VP 
> blows up because it rejected some piece of real mail she really, really 
> wanted. I'll bid on two hours.

John, would you please try to read my notes instead of just
playing a parlor game with them. I said that we plan to annotate
the mail if it doesn't verify. We're not idiots, and it's a
disservice to the entire community that you are treating us as
if we were.

>>> Mail from this list won't validate, you know, and I doubt that many 
>>> others will, but I know I'm not going to make any headway in that 
>>> direction.
>>
>>
>> Every piece of mail I've sent this morning has validated. Really.
> 
> 
> That's because it was all Re: and already had the subject line tag.  
> It's your lucky day.

Please try to stay within your own experience. You clearly have
no idea what you're talking about here. I've implemented this and have
*way* more experience at where the problem are and are not. You're
quite simply wrong, and it's not helping this working group when you're
spreading clearly false information.

		Mike