[ietf-dkim] Concerns about DKIM and mailiing lists, etc.
mike at mtcc.com
Wed Mar 15 12:16:37 PST 2006
Paul Hoffman wrote:
> It is far safer to assume that any of the signed headers might be
> broken, and to encourage systems (such as mailing lists) that are
> known to break DKIM signatures to sign after they break them.
And then what?
Everybody wants to hand-wave this issue away with the majikal "list
but the reality is that they are not obviously useable to somebody who has
actually written lots of code in this area.
More information about the ietf-dkim