[ietf-dkim] Suggested alternate algorithm specification language,
for now
Dave Crocker
dcrocker at bbiw.net
Wed Feb 22 10:47:55 PST 2006
> It means that the software implementation supports it as a selectable option.
> If you don't say this what's to prevent someone from writing an
> implementation that only supports Camilla-MAC hashing and calling it
> compliant?
ok. understand.
i had completely forgotten the concerns about both marketing and product
acquisition that the spec needs to cover.
Yes, declaring requirements for core "capabilities" pertains to the
customer/user activity BEFORE sending any bits.
thanks.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
<http://bbiw.net>
More information about the ietf-dkim
mailing list