[ietf-dkim] Suggested alternate algorithm specification language, for now

Dave Crocker dcrocker at bbiw.net
Wed Feb 22 10:47:55 PST 2006




> It means that the software implementation supports it as a selectable option.
>  If you don't say this what's to prevent someone from writing an 
> implementation that only supports Camilla-MAC hashing and calling it
> compliant?

ok.  understand.

i had completely forgotten the concerns about both marketing and product 
acquisition that the spec needs to cover.

Yes, declaring requirements for core "capabilities" pertains to the 
customer/user activity BEFORE sending any bits.

thanks.

d/

-- 

Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
<http://bbiw.net>


More information about the ietf-dkim mailing list