[ietf-dkim] Re: Attempted summary

[william(at)elan.net]

On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Mark Delany wrote:

> Right. So the question is, can a signature be constructed such that it
> doesn't interact with SSP to infer a binding above and beyond "I claim
> it passed through me"?

Make 'i' optional.

My preference however is to have field in signature that specifies
what type of email parameter the signature is associated with (i.e.
see 'id' segment of metasignatures).

-- 
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william at elan.net