[ietf-dkim] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-fenton-dkim-threats-02.txt]

[Stephen Farrell]

Michael Thomas wrote:
> Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
>> Michael Thomas wrote:
>>
>>> Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>>  >   If a domain owner publishes an open policy, and if some "bad"
>>>  >   unsigned messages apparently emanate from that domain then the
>>>  >   domain owner's reputation may suffer.
>>>
>>> Why would any rational reputation system make such an assertion?
>>
>> I dunno, I was paraphrasing. And that's why I also said:
>>
>>  > I think that that's true,
>>  > but of course its already true today without DKIM or SSP.
>>
>> (Are reputation systems really rational - must get that Turing
>> test dusted down so:-)
> 
> Sorry, I was mainly reacting to Frank's endorsement of your
> list's inclusion. I don't really think this point is a valid
> threat.

No probs.

S.