[ietf-dkim] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-fenton-dkim-threats-02.txt]

[Michael Thomas]

Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> 
> Michael Thomas wrote:
> 
>> Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>  >   If a domain owner publishes an open policy, and if some "bad"
>>  >   unsigned messages apparently emanate from that domain then the
>>  >   domain owner's reputation may suffer.
>>
>> Why would any rational reputation system make such an assertion?
> 
> 
> I dunno, I was paraphrasing. And that's why I also said:
> 
>  > I think that that's true,
>  > but of course its already true today without DKIM or SSP.
> 
> (Are reputation systems really rational - must get that Turing
> test dusted down so:-)

Sorry, I was mainly reacting to Frank's endorsement of your
list's inclusion. I don't really think this point is a valid
threat.

		Mike