[ietf-dkim] some more comments on the threats draft

[Dave Crocker]

> 1. Forward references. The document references the base and ssp drafts. That'll
> cause this to be held in the rfc editor's queue until those documents are done.
> If possible, we might want to remove those dependencies somehow (e.g. reference
> some paper about dkim/domainkeys instead and leave out ssp). Seems a bit silly
> I admit, so I'm not sure. 


Actually, it reflects the problem of having a threats document really be 
something else.

If the threats document really were about threats and concepts, it would not 
have to cite DKIM specification specifics.

d/
-- 

Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
<http://bbiw.net>