[ietf-dkim] Re: The Value of Reputation

[Frank Ellermann]

Douglas Otis wrote:

> dangerous open-ended policies as seen with SPF. (Very bad.)

Define "open-ended":  I've no idea what you're talking about,
or rather if it's NEUTRAL you're wrong.  And for your favourite
"pure DKIM" I'd like to know what it's good for:

As an example, what exactly could say Ironport do with it ?
Organize senderbase more efficiently, would that be all, or
what else is the purpose of your "pure DKIM" ?

This "pure DKIM" needs some convincing reasons why senders
and receivers should bother to implement it, "helps to create
white lists" isn't good enough from my POV, but probably I
just miss some of your points.
                               Bye, Frank