[ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)

[Dave Crocker]

Eric Rescorla wrote:
> But the problem is that the currently proposed charter, would, IMO,
> preclude the adoption of something that was a better way to go if it
> couldn't be demonstrated that that change was necessary for the success
> of DKIM. That's why discussing that charter language is prior
> the discussion of specific technical changes.


That's the nice thing about objections without investment.

They are so purely conceptual and, therefore are not burdened by any 
obligation to provide substance.  Not even the minor effort of examples.

In that light, it's not surprising that you failed to gain support 
during the open DKIm BOF and online group discussions.

But never mind, you've got folks hassled enough they are going to give 
in just to get the working group chartered.  Boy oh boy does this bode 
well for the working group, or what?

d/

-- 

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  +1.408.246.8253
  dcrocker  a t ...
  WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net