[ietf-dkim] Re: WG Review: Domain Keys Identified Mail (dkim)
ekr at networkresonance.com
Thu Dec 22 15:50:05 PST 2005
Patrick Peterson <ppeterson at ironport.com> wrote:
> Let's hammer out the technical specifications, make them the best they
> can be and get this thing to market. Let's not discuss whether the
> charter should allow divergence from DNS, let's discuss the best
> solution and if DNS can be proven the wrong way to go, I'll gladly argue
> for this change. Let's be technologists, not philosophers.
But the problem is that the currently proposed charter, would, IMO,
preclude the adoption of something that was a better way to go if it
couldn't be demonstrated that that change was necessary for the success
of DKIM. That's why discussing that charter language is prior
the discussion of specific technical changes.
More information about the ietf-dkim