[ietf-dkim] Re: dkim.org (mipassoc.org/dkim) web page updated
dotis at mail-abuse.org
Mon Nov 7 19:01:40 PST 2005
On Nov 7, 2005, at 6:24 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On 11/07/2005 20:37, Douglas Otis wrote:
>> DKIM without SSP can be better than with SSP. Take out the SSP
>> approach, and there should be fewer concerns with respect to
>> potential impact, while there would not be any benefit lost. If
>> anything there would be greater benefits as this approach offers more
>> information without incurring additional overhead.
> I've no doubt that DKIM without SSP would be better for providers
> of large
> scale commercial reputation services. It would be pretty useless
> for me.
DKIM without SSP provides an ability for Name-based white-listing of
transports. Name-based white-listing/reputation would not be prone
to IP address exploits. Filtering programs would have a verifiable
source for a message to permit a significant reduction in related
errors. If there was abuse, there would be a verified name for
addressing complaints. Why would that be useless for you?
What major benefit do you expect?
More information about the ietf-dkim