[ietf-dkim] Email-address independent of signing-domain DKIM charter

[Scott Kitterman]

On 11/06/2005 17:35, Douglas Otis wrote:
> On Nov 5, 2005, at 9:16 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> > However, the best way to gauge this probably is for you to specify
> > the text that you propose to have changed in the charter.
>
> While there appears to be some support for imposing a requirement
> that From header always be associated with the transmitting domain,
> there is a lack of appreciation that an open-ended authorization
> becomes the target of abuse.  ...

If you change lack of appreciation to lack of agreeing with you that this is 
the end of the world, I suppose that's not to far off.


> There is an alternative to that approach.  This alternative should
> provide far greater abatement of abuse with a charter as follows:
>
snipped for brevity

I think this would be a really bad idea.  I like the current draft charter a 
lot better.

Scott K