[ietf-dkim] Review of draft-fenton-dkim-threats-01
mike at mtcc.com
Sat Oct 29 09:38:00 PDT 2005
Eric Rescorla wrote:
> Dave Crocker <dhc at dcrocker.net> wrote:
>>>What I would have expected in a threat analysis of this type is that
>>>one would start with a relatively broad view of the type of system
>>>one was considering developing ("server-based message-based signatures
>>>to prevent mail forgery") and then describe potential attacks on
>>>such systems and the types of countermeasures that can be used to
>>>protect against them.
>>We seem to be suffering from trying to hit a moving target.
> Hmm... Maybe, but I think my comments are in line with comments
> I've made previously. It's possible that my comments don't
> agree with Russ's, of course.
That's seems to be the genesis. Hence my comments to the ietf list
a couple of months ago. What would you have us do since this seems
to be a meta argument between you and our AD?
More information about the ietf-dkim