[ietf-dkim] over-the-wire (in)compatibility between pre-IETF
DKIM and (eventual) IETF DKIM
dhc at dcrocker.net
Fri Oct 21 12:51:18 PDT 2005
> I understand there is a desire not to introduce many more things or
> drive the spec in new directions, and I agree with that. Having said
> that, it is better to make any changes now while adoption is low than
> wait until adoption is much higher.
On the other hand, doing more work takes more time. More time means
more delay getting more adoption.
In fact I have been getting a sense of some folks delaying adoption
until the IETF standard is produced.
So the question is whether we want that to be 2006 or is it ok to be
2007, 8, ...?
More information about the ietf-dkim