signature construct (was: Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM BOF -- draft
charter and agenda)
Earl Hood
earl at earlhood.com
Sat Oct 15 11:54:37 PDT 2005
On October 14, 2005 at 12:08, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> PS: Just so's I can reconstruct it for myself later, the construct
> might end up something like:
> body-hash = Hash1(nonce, body)
> sig-bits = Private-key(Hash2(nonce,header-stuff, body-hash))
Actually the "data" hash would be more like:
data-hash = Hash1(nonce, header-stuff, body)
sig-bits = Private-key(Hash2(nonce, DKIM-Signature-field))
I.e. The digital signature is only on the DKIM-Signature field,
nothing else.
--ewh
More information about the ietf-dkim
mailing list