[ietf-dkim] Re: signature construct

[Arvel Hathcock]

> and in any case I didn't expect IIM to be used to reject messages out of 
> hand.  But I'm willing to revisit that decision, especially since there is 
> now stronger sending policy that might make outright rejection a 
> possibility in some cases.

Well, this is definitely a topic for the WG but if we're contemplating 
rejecting the message during the SMTP session itself, my MTA is already 
doing that but, of course, it has to go through the DATA phase first.  If 
you want to reject prior to DATA us MTA vendors should implement on an SMTP 
extension that fetches the headers only (there is one - I think) ?

-- 
Arvel