on multi-signatures (was Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: dkim service
fenton at cisco.com
Fri Oct 14 08:08:51 PDT 2005
Stephen Farrell wrote:
> There's clearly confusion/disagreement on multi-signature
> semantics, and I can see why.
> While this is something that has to be cleared up, I hope
> I'm right in saying that its not so fundamental as to be
> a show-stopper in terms of getting a wg off the ground.
> For now, isn't it probably ok to add this to the to-do
> list and continue to work on the threat analysis which
> was a show-stopper last time?
Works for me. I think we have established that this is an interesting
area for the WG to consider.
More information about the ietf-dkim